Broadscale habitat (EUNIS level 3) for Whitsand and Looe Bay Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ)
This it the updated broadscale habitat (BSH) map for the Whitsand and Looe Bay MCZ. Several BSH were identified as part of this map creation including: Infralittoral rock, moderate energy circalittoral rock, subtidal sand, subtidal mixed sediments, subtidal coarse sediment
Simple
- Alternate title
-
GB001499
- Date (Creation)
- 2014-07-23
- Date (Publication)
- 2018-04-26
- Citation identifier
- EMODnetSeabedHabitats / GB001499
- Point of contact
-
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role Defra
open@defra.gsi open@defra.gsi.gov.uk
Owner Natural England
enquiries@naturalengland.org enquiries@naturalengland.org.uk
Custodian
-
GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0
-
-
Habitats and biotopes
-
- Use limitation
-
┬® Defra. Data may be re-used under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
- Use limitation
-
geossAttribution
- Access constraints
- Other restrictions
- Other constraints
-
no limitation
- Spatial representation type
- Vector
- Denominator
- 5000
- Language
- English
- Topic category
-
- Biota
- Oceans
))
- Begin date
- 2013-01-01
- End date
- 2013-12-31
- Supplemental Information
-
Jenkins, C., Curtis, M. (2015) Whitsand and Looe Bay MCZ Summary Site Report. Defra Contract Reference: MB0120. Report Number: 24. Version 3. Available from: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12858_WhitsandandLooeBayMCZ_SummarySiteReport_V3.pdf
- Reference system identifier
-
EPSG
/
WGS 84 (EPSG:4326)
/
7.9
- Topology level
- Geometry only
- Distribution format
-
Name Version ESRI Shapefile
1.0
- OnLine resource
-
Protocol Linkage Name WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12858_WhitsandandLooeBayMCZ_SummarySiteReport_V3.pdf Whitsand and Looe Bay rMCZ site report
OGC:WMS
https://ows.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/geoserver/emodnet_view_maplibrary/wms? gb001499
OGC:WFS
https://ows.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/geoserver/emodnet_open_maplibrary/wfs? gb001499
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
https://files.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/data/EMODnetSBHsurvey_GB001499.zip EMODnet Seabed Habitats download
- Hierarchy level
- Dataset
Conformance result
- Date (Publication)
- 2009-12-15
- Explanation
-
See the referenced specification
- Pass
- Yes
Conformance result
- Date (Publication)
- 2010-12-08
- Explanation
-
See the referenced specification
- Pass
- Yes
- Statement
-
A semi-automated object-based image analysis (OBIA) was performed to produce the map. OBIA is a two-step approach consisting of segmentation and classification (Blaschke, 2010), implemented in the software package eCognition v8.7.2. The backscatter image is segmented into objects (sections of the image with homogenous backscatter characteristics). For each of these objects, mean values of the primary acoustic data layers and their derivatives were calculated.
Each stage in the process is numbered and described in detail below.
Stage 1. Data Preparation
Prior to analysis, bathymetry data were re-sampled onto a grid at 2 m resolution, whilst backscatter data were re-sampled at 1 m resolution. Default ÔÇÿno dataÔÇÖ values in the Floating Point Geotiff files were transformed to null values within ArcGIS v10.1.
Stage 2. Derivatives calculated
A range of derivatives were calculated from bathymetry and backscatter datasets. Only the backscatter dataset, however, was used for classification.
Stage 3. Segmentation
Segmentation divides an image into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial characteristics. The resulting objects can be characterised by their various features, such as layer values (mean, standard deviation, skewness, etc.), geometry (extent, shape, etc.), texture and many others.
The input layers used were the primary acoustic data layers (bathymetry and backscatter strength) and the derivatives roughness and BPI25.
Segmentation was carried out using the multi-resolution segmentation algorithm in eCognition. This is an optimisation procedure that starts with an individual pixel and merges it consecutively with neighbouring pixels to form an object. The process continues until a threshold value for a scale is reached. The threshold is set by the operator, who determines the variability allowed in the objects.
The goal of segmentation is to create meaningful objects that represent areas of homogenous values in the map image. The size of the objects is influenced by the scale parameter mentioned above and the heterogeneity of the image. For a fixed value of the scale parameter, a homogeneous area of seabed will have larger objects than a heterogeneous area. Likewise, for a fixed seabed heterogeneity, larger values of the scale parameter produce larger objects than smaller values. The scale parameter was selected using the Estimation of Scale Parameters (ESP) tool. The tool calculates local variance (LV) of object heterogeneity within a scene for increasing scale parameters at user-defined intervals. The threshold for rate of change of LV relative to the data properties in the entire image, can be used to indicate the scale level at which the image can be segmented in the most appropriate manner (Dragut et al., 2010). The final segmentation was carried out at pixel level on backscatter strength, bathymetry, BPI25 and roughness with the scale parameter set at 10.
Stage 4. Classification
For each of the objects created, mean values of the primary acoustic data layers and their derivatives were calculated (e.g., the mean backscatter value for the grid cells lying within the object) for further statistical analysis and modelling. Objects and their feature mean values were exported as a GIS shapefile for further use in assigning their corresponding sediment class and producing a broadscale habitat map. Though ÔÇÿHigh Energy Infralittoral RockÔÇÖ and ÔÇÿModerate Energy Infralittoral RockÔÇÖ broadscale habitats were identified from video and still analysis it was not possible to predict the distributions of these habitats due to their similar reflectivityÔÇÖs, and a lack of discriminatory evidence. With this in mind they were grouped to create one habitat of ÔÇÿInfralittoral RockÔÇÖ for prediction and classification purposes. Furthermore, ÔÇÿSubtidal Macrophyte Dominated SedimentÔÇÖ was identified as part of the video analysis. This particular broadscale habitat is highly associated with subtidal coarse sediments with one being discriminated from the other based on biological components rather than physical ones. To this end remote techniques were not suitable for the discrimination of these two habitats, from one another, as investigation of the data did not allow for an environmental discriminator to be identified. Classification of ÔÇÿSubtidal Macrophyte Dominated SedimentsÔÇÖ was therefore reduced to classification as ÔÇÿSubtidal Coarse SedimentÔÇÖ.
Metadata
- File identifier
- f38b8056-cdd5-4315-84b3-02e829101aed XML
- Metadata language
- English
- Character set
- MD_CharacterSetCode_utf8
- Hierarchy level
- Dataset
- Date stamp
- 2020-01-15T12:12:30
- Metadata standard name
-
ISO19115
- Metadata standard version
-
2003/Cor.1:2006
- Metadata author
-
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role JNCC
HabitatMapping@jncc.gov HabitatMapping@jncc.gov.uk
Point of contact
Overviews
Spatial extent
))
Provided by
