• ICES Metadata Catalogue
  •  
  •  
  •  

Broadscale habitat (EUNIS level 3) for the Cromer Shoals Chalk Beds recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ)

Broadscale habitat (EUNIS level 3) for the Cromer Shoals Chalk Beds recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ).Seabed texture polygons mapped using semi automated ISO cluster unsupervised classification and expert interpretation of acoustic data (MBES bathymetry and backscatter) and groundtruthing data from PSA analysis and image (stills and video) classification.

Simple

Alternate title

GB001524

Date (Creation)
2015-03-02
Date (Publication)
2018-04-26
Citation identifier
EMODnetSeabedHabitats / GB001524
Point of contact
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role

Defra

open@defra.gsi open@defra.gsi.gov.uk

Owner

Natural England

enquiries@naturalengland.org enquiries@naturalengland.org.uk

Custodian

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

  • Habitats and biotopes

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ReferenceHabitatTypeSchemeValue

  • Eunis

Use limitation

┬® Defra. Data may be re-used under the terms of the Open Government Licence.

Use limitation

geossAttribution

Access constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints

no limitation

Spatial representation type
Vector
Denominator
200000
Language
English
Topic category
  • Biota
  • Oceans
N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Begin date
2012-01-30
End date
2014-08-28
Supplemental Information

Green, S., Cooper, R., Dove, R. (2015) Cromer Shoal Chalk Beds rMCZ Post-survey Site Report. DefraContract Reference: MB0120. Report Number: 34. Version 5. Available from: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12825_Cromer_Shoal_Chalk_Beds_rMCZ_SummarySiteReport_v5.pdf

Reference system identifier
EPSG / WGS 84 (EPSG:4326) / 7.9

Topology level
Geometry only
Distribution format
Name Version

ESRI Shapefile

1.0

OnLine resource
Protocol Linkage Name

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link

http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12825_Cromer_Shoal_Chalk_Beds_rMCZ_SummarySiteReport_v5.pdf

Cromer Shoal Chalk Beds site report

OGC:WMS

https://ows.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/geoserver/emodnet_view_maplibrary/wms?

gb001524

OGC:WFS

https://ows.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/geoserver/emodnet_open_maplibrary/wfs?

gb001524

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link

https://files.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/data/EMODnetSBHsurvey_GB001524.zip

EMODnet Seabed Habitats download

Hierarchy level
Dataset

Conformance result

Date (Publication)
2009-12-15
Explanation

See the referenced specification

Pass
Yes

Conformance result

Date (Publication)
2010-12-08
Explanation

See the referenced specification

Pass
Yes
Statement

Three of the five dedicated surveys of the Cromer Shoal Chalk Beds rMCZ were commissioned to collect acoustic data. The first acoustic survey was undertaken during March and April 2012 by Titan Environmental Surveys Ltd on board the survey catamaran Titan Endeavour. A Geoacoustics Geoswathe system was used to collect detailed swathe bathymetry and acoustic backscatter data. Processing of the bathymetry data was carried out using the GeoSwath processing suite, GS+ 3.50. This survey targeted the foreshore area designated as Priority 1 for survey and partially covered the Priority 2 area, at its western extent (Jenner, 2012). The second acoustic survey was conducted by Cefas in January 2013 on board the RV Cefas Endeavour. This survey was originally intended to collect full coverage acoustic data from the entire site. However, due to time and weather constraints, this survey targeted the site area further offshore, to the north east of the site, and survey lines were conducted with a larger-than-intended line spacing of approximately 320 m (Ware, 2013). Multibeam bathymetry and backscatter data were acquired using the Kongsberg EM2040 system, operated at 300 kHz. Multibeam echosounder (MBES) data were processed using CARIS HIPS software. Backscatter data were processed with Fledermaus Geocoder Toolbox. The final acoustic survey was conducted in February and March 2014 by Gardline Geosurvey using a hull mounted Kongsberg Simrad EM3002 system on board the MV Confidante. Data were processed using CARIS HIPS/SIPS with fina lvisualisation deliverables processed with QPS Fledermaus. This survey targeted the Priority 3 area of the rMCZ (Januszewki, 2014). All bathymetry data were collected and processed in accordance with the International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO) Standards for Hydrographic Surveys - Order 1 (Special Publication 44, Edition 4).


Stations were selected for grab sampling if suitable sublittoral sediment was observed in at least 50% of the seabed images collected. Stations were avoided if rocky habitat and/or delicate epifauna were observed. Generally, a position fix from the mid-point of the drop camera survey line was used as the target for grab deployment. However, if a mixture of habitat types was observed during the camera transect, the most appropriate target position was chosen. A mini-Hamon grab, with a sampling area of 0.1 m2 , was deployed from the stern gantry of the vessels to collect sediment from the seabed, as described by Ware and Kenny (2011). Sampling positions were recorded using HYDROpro data acquisition software when the gear contacted the seabed. Once recovered, the sample was emptied into a suitable container, photographed, and the sample volume measured. A sub-sample (approx. 500 ml) of sediment was removed for particle size analysis (PSA). The remaining sample was washed over a 1 mm mesh sieve, photographed and preserved in a buffered 8% formaldehyde solution.


ArcGIS was used to perform an initial unsupervised classification on the acquired backscatter image. The single band backscatter mosaic was filtered and smoothed prior to the application of an Iso cluster/maximum likelihood

classification routine. Python scripting language was used to automate the workflow.


The vectorised output of the semi-automated process is reviewed manually to assign sedimentological classifications in accordance with the EUNIS habitat classification system. An appreciation of the geological characteristics of the area also means that the analyst can ÔÇÿsense checkÔÇÖ the outputs. Polygons can be amended, modified and merged to best represent the acoustic data, groundtruthing samples with the influence of geological judgement. The newly acquired acoustic data covered approximately 78% of the site area, mapping was therefore restricted to this area only.

Metadata

File identifier
a01b0553-f001-4fa8-92a2-1905d8e5401e XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
MD_CharacterSetCode_utf8
Hierarchy level
Dataset
Date stamp
2020-01-15T12:29:13
Metadata standard name

ISO19115

Metadata standard version

2003/Cor.1:2006

Metadata author
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role

JNCC

HabitatMapping@jncc.gov HabitatMapping@jncc.gov.uk

Point of contact
 
 

Overviews

Spatial extent

N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Keywords

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0
Habitats and biotopes

Provided by

logo

Share on social sites

Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •